Abstract
English-medium academic publications concerning bilingual education (BE) in China, which involves using a foreign language (usually English) to teach part of the subject matter of non-language subject(s), are emerging. This paper aims to clarify some misleading information and to challenge a number of viewpoints arising from these publications. It proposes Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as a more accurate label than immersion for the most widely used Chinese-English BE model, takes issue with the claim that there is no sign suggesting the strong popularity of BE will dissipate in the foreseeable future, and challenges the evidence used in a discussion of driving forces behind the BE "craze". It concludes with some suggestions for future research, such as identifying good practices of CLIL.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 184-200 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Asian EFL Journal |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bilingual education
- CLIL
- Content and language integrated learning
- English-medium instruction
- Foreign-medium instruction
- Immersion