TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban sustainability indicators re-visited
T2 - lessons from property-led urban development in China
AU - Xu, Yunqing
AU - Keivani, Ramin
AU - Cao, Albert Junjian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 IAIA.
PY - 2018/7/4
Y1 - 2018/7/4
N2 - This paper proposes a bespoke urban sustainability indicator framework in the context of China’s prevalent property-led urban development. Emphasising local characteristics and incorporating underlying institutions, it advocates a more nuanced, holistic and dynamic approach when addressing sustainability issues. Selection of indicators were based on extensive literature reviews and tested through an international expert survey comprising both China-based and overseas-based experts. The two groups of experts have shown divergent views, with the former prioritising economic and institutional aspects over environmental and social factors. It also provides transferable policy insights into developing countries more generally, given many similarities in broader development challenges. Discussion on recent literature and urban development reinforces the applicability of these tailor-made indicators to not only monitoring but also explaining and predicting urban changes. We argue it is necessary to recognise the centrality of property-led urban development in urban sustainable development, and the need for examining the complex relations between the property sector and urban sustainability via inclusion of institutional analysis and a multi-method approach combining quantitative and qualitative evaluations.
AB - This paper proposes a bespoke urban sustainability indicator framework in the context of China’s prevalent property-led urban development. Emphasising local characteristics and incorporating underlying institutions, it advocates a more nuanced, holistic and dynamic approach when addressing sustainability issues. Selection of indicators were based on extensive literature reviews and tested through an international expert survey comprising both China-based and overseas-based experts. The two groups of experts have shown divergent views, with the former prioritising economic and institutional aspects over environmental and social factors. It also provides transferable policy insights into developing countries more generally, given many similarities in broader development challenges. Discussion on recent literature and urban development reinforces the applicability of these tailor-made indicators to not only monitoring but also explaining and predicting urban changes. We argue it is necessary to recognise the centrality of property-led urban development in urban sustainable development, and the need for examining the complex relations between the property sector and urban sustainability via inclusion of institutional analysis and a multi-method approach combining quantitative and qualitative evaluations.
KW - China
KW - Tailor-made sustainability indicators
KW - developing countries
KW - institutional approach
KW - property-led urban development
KW - quantitative and qualitative evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044246409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14615517.2018.1447735
DO - 10.1080/14615517.2018.1447735
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044246409
SN - 1461-5517
VL - 36
SP - 308
EP - 322
JO - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
JF - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
IS - 4
ER -