TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Trust, Trust Differential, and Radius of Trust on Volunteering
T2 - Evidence from the Hong Kong Chinese
AU - Liu, Susu
AU - Wen, Zhuoyi
AU - Su, Jionglong
AU - Ming-lin Chong, Alice
AU - Kong, Shiyi
AU - Jiang, Zhengyong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The promotion and development of sustainable volunteerism is crucial for quality social services. Previous studies on the relationship between social trust and volunteering is mixed and inclusive. This article aims to investigate the effects of the particularized trust, generalized trust, trust differential (i.e., difference in levels between particularized and generalized trust) and radius of trust (i.e., difference in levels between in-group trust and out-group trust), on volunteering. By interviewing 1,170 Hong Kong Chinese in a territory-wide randomized household survey, this article reveals that generalized trust facilitates volunteering, whereas particularized trust exhibits an inverse effect. The radius of trust could not facilitate voluntary participation. This article distinguishes between the reverse contributions of generalized and particularized trust among Hong Kong Chinese, thereby providing a clear and precise explanation for social trust-volunteering relationships. Future research should focus on the conceptualization and operationalization of radius of trust and cross-cultural comparative studies on the effects of particularized and generalized trust using longitudinal data.
AB - The promotion and development of sustainable volunteerism is crucial for quality social services. Previous studies on the relationship between social trust and volunteering is mixed and inclusive. This article aims to investigate the effects of the particularized trust, generalized trust, trust differential (i.e., difference in levels between particularized and generalized trust) and radius of trust (i.e., difference in levels between in-group trust and out-group trust), on volunteering. By interviewing 1,170 Hong Kong Chinese in a territory-wide randomized household survey, this article reveals that generalized trust facilitates volunteering, whereas particularized trust exhibits an inverse effect. The radius of trust could not facilitate voluntary participation. This article distinguishes between the reverse contributions of generalized and particularized trust among Hong Kong Chinese, thereby providing a clear and precise explanation for social trust-volunteering relationships. Future research should focus on the conceptualization and operationalization of radius of trust and cross-cultural comparative studies on the effects of particularized and generalized trust using longitudinal data.
KW - Generalized trust
KW - Hong Kong
KW - particularized trust
KW - radius of trust
KW - trust differential
KW - volunteering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087124839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01488376.2020.1758867
DO - 10.1080/01488376.2020.1758867
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087124839
SN - 0148-8376
VL - 47
SP - 276
EP - 291
JO - Journal of Social Service Research
JF - Journal of Social Service Research
IS - 2
ER -