TY - JOUR
T1 - Participatory governance in China
T2 - Analysing state-society relations in participatory initiatives in Suzhou
AU - Chang, Ying
AU - Lau, Mandy
AU - Calogero, Pietro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Liverpool University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Participatory governance has been increasingly promoted in China since 2006. Whilst the state appears to be supportive of nurturing self-governance at the community level through providing financial incentives, it is worth investigating whether the state hampers citizen autonomy in practice. This article examines the implementation of participatory initiatives in a middle-class neighbourhood within the China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP). Through interviews and observing the interactions between state actors, residents and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), this paper examines the impact of changing the facilitator of self-governance initiatives from academics to NGOs. The findings reveal complex relations: although the state does not interfere in participatory processes directly, statedefined evaluation criteria that privilege 'innovative' practices, and budget constraints of NGOs, have weakened the capacity of residents to practise self-governance. The findings add to the literature on participatory governance by highlighting the unique role of community leaders in shaping the quality of citizen involvement in participatory initiatives in China.
AB - Participatory governance has been increasingly promoted in China since 2006. Whilst the state appears to be supportive of nurturing self-governance at the community level through providing financial incentives, it is worth investigating whether the state hampers citizen autonomy in practice. This article examines the implementation of participatory initiatives in a middle-class neighbourhood within the China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP). Through interviews and observing the interactions between state actors, residents and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), this paper examines the impact of changing the facilitator of self-governance initiatives from academics to NGOs. The findings reveal complex relations: although the state does not interfere in participatory processes directly, statedefined evaluation criteria that privilege 'innovative' practices, and budget constraints of NGOs, have weakened the capacity of residents to practise self-governance. The findings add to the literature on participatory governance by highlighting the unique role of community leaders in shaping the quality of citizen involvement in participatory initiatives in China.
KW - China
KW - Community development
KW - Community planning
KW - NGO
KW - Participatory governance
KW - State-society relations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068375951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3828/idpr.2018.32
DO - 10.3828/idpr.2018.32
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068375951
SN - 1474-6743
VL - 41
SP - 329
EP - 352
JO - International Development Planning Review
JF - International Development Planning Review
IS - 3
ER -