TY - JOUR
T1 - On the relationship between nutrient use efficiency and fertility in forest ecosystems
AU - Knops, Johannes M.H.
AU - Koenig, Walter D.
AU - Nash, Thomas H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Brad Shaffer for pointing out the correct way to analyze ratio data, Dennis Young for statistical advice, Rien Aerts, John Barthell, Terry Chapin, Shahid Naeem, Anne Royalty, Bill Schlesinger, D.E. Schulze, David Tilman, Peter Vitousek and Dave Wedin for reviewing the manuscript. J.M.H.K. and W.D.K were supported by the University of California’s Integrated Hardwoods Range Management Program and the site data of Q. douglasii were collected with support from NSF grants BSR-89-07405 (Arizona State University) and BSR-89-07689 (Duke University).
PY - 1997/5
Y1 - 1997/5
N2 - The concept of nutrient use efficiency is central in understanding ecosystem functioning because it is the step in which plants can influence the return of the nutrients to the soil pool and the quality of the litter. There are several ways to define nutrient use efficiency, but a common way within ecosystem ecology is as the ratio of litterfall production per unit nutrient to the litterfall nutrient content. However, this ratio is not a valid measurement to examine nutrient use efficiency in relationship to ecosystem fertility because there is a strong autocorrelation between litterfall dry mass per trait of nutrient and the amount of nutrients. More appropriate statistical analysis of the relationship between the fertility of ecosystems and the amount of nutrients in the litterfall are inconclusive, but indicate that, at least in some cases, there is (1) no pattern, (2) higher nutrient use efficiency at intermediate-fertility sites or (3) higher efficiency at higher-fertility sites. There is, however, no indication that nutrient use efficiency is greater in nutrient-poor ecosystems. This conclusion has important consequences for ecosystem nutrient cycling. Given the lack of a clear, consistent relationship between site fertility and litterfall nutrients, there is little likelihood that such a feedback mechanism plays an important role in ecosystem nutrient cycling.
AB - The concept of nutrient use efficiency is central in understanding ecosystem functioning because it is the step in which plants can influence the return of the nutrients to the soil pool and the quality of the litter. There are several ways to define nutrient use efficiency, but a common way within ecosystem ecology is as the ratio of litterfall production per unit nutrient to the litterfall nutrient content. However, this ratio is not a valid measurement to examine nutrient use efficiency in relationship to ecosystem fertility because there is a strong autocorrelation between litterfall dry mass per trait of nutrient and the amount of nutrients. More appropriate statistical analysis of the relationship between the fertility of ecosystems and the amount of nutrients in the litterfall are inconclusive, but indicate that, at least in some cases, there is (1) no pattern, (2) higher nutrient use efficiency at intermediate-fertility sites or (3) higher efficiency at higher-fertility sites. There is, however, no indication that nutrient use efficiency is greater in nutrient-poor ecosystems. This conclusion has important consequences for ecosystem nutrient cycling. Given the lack of a clear, consistent relationship between site fertility and litterfall nutrients, there is little likelihood that such a feedback mechanism plays an important role in ecosystem nutrient cycling.
KW - Litter quality
KW - Litterfall
KW - Nutrient cycling
KW - Nutrient use efficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030613818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004420050194
DO - 10.1007/s004420050194
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0030613818
SN - 0029-8549
VL - 110
SP - 550
EP - 556
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 4
ER -