TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the digit effect a cognate effect? Digits (still) differ from pictures in non-phonologically mediated language switching
AU - Liu, Hong
AU - Chaouch-Orozco, Adel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2023/5/17
Y1 - 2023/5/17
N2 - Language control in bilinguals is often investigated with the language switching paradigm. Switch costs reflect the ease/difficulty of applying this control mechanism. The type of stimuli employed in the experiments may influence switch costs. To date, only one study has compared digit vs picture processing, reporting reduced switch costs for digits (Declerck, Koch & Philipp, 2012). This result was adjudicated to phonological overlap between the languages used. Crucially, it remains an open question whether this digit effect generalises to language combinations without phonological relation. We fill this gap by investigating language switching with two language pairs differing in relative proficiency (L1 Chinese-L2 English, L1 Chinese-L3 French), where cross-language phonological activation is not expected. Overall, a digit effect is observed in the Chinese-English pair. Contrary to Declerck et al.'s (2012) finding, digits increased switch costs. Phonological mediation cannot explain this effect; instead, we suggest its origin lies in within-language word association links.
AB - Language control in bilinguals is often investigated with the language switching paradigm. Switch costs reflect the ease/difficulty of applying this control mechanism. The type of stimuli employed in the experiments may influence switch costs. To date, only one study has compared digit vs picture processing, reporting reduced switch costs for digits (Declerck, Koch & Philipp, 2012). This result was adjudicated to phonological overlap between the languages used. Crucially, it remains an open question whether this digit effect generalises to language combinations without phonological relation. We fill this gap by investigating language switching with two language pairs differing in relative proficiency (L1 Chinese-L2 English, L1 Chinese-L3 French), where cross-language phonological activation is not expected. Overall, a digit effect is observed in the Chinese-English pair. Contrary to Declerck et al.'s (2012) finding, digits increased switch costs. Phonological mediation cannot explain this effect; instead, we suggest its origin lies in within-language word association links.
KW - bilingualism
KW - digit naming
KW - language control
KW - picture naming
KW - switch costs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158958576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1366728922000608
DO - 10.1017/S1366728922000608
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85158958576
SN - 1366-7289
VL - 26
SP - 469
EP - 475
JO - Bilingualism
JF - Bilingualism
IS - 3
ER -