Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 199-218 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science |
| Volume | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, Vol. 6, 09.2022, p. 199-218.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - How the Chinese writing system can reveal the fundamentals of hierarchical lexical structure
AU - Yin, Hui
AU - Libben, Gary
AU - Derwing, Bruce L
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Compounding is the most common way in which languages can create new words from existing ones. The investigation of how compound words are represented and processed in the mind can therefore reveal fundamental properties of lexical representation and processing. Because of the properties of its morphology and its writing system, Chinese offers a special opportunity for such investigation. In Chinese, it is common for compound words to contain three or more constituents, which are organized into hierarchical structures. Using a lexical decision task, we examined whether the arrangement of such sublexical hierarchies within triconstituent compound words would affect their ease of visual processing. We found that left-branching structures were processed more accurately and more quickly than right-branching ones (left-branching triconstituent compounds are those in which an embedded two-character compound is the modifier and a single character is as the head, as in the English left-branching structure hot dog bun). This processing advantage of left-branching structures was supported by the results of a metalinguistic segmentation task in which participants showed left-branching preferences when presented with special triconstituent compounds which have no feasible branching structure (loanwords and flat structure compounds). In the Chinese character-based writing system, left-branching and right-branching compounds are written exactly the same way. This is in contrast to English in which it is common for the branching direction of a triconstituent compound to be indicated by the presence or absence of a space within the compound structure (e.g., watchdog group, consumer watchdog). Thus, the results from Chinese support the view that hierarchical constituent structure plays a role in processing in the absence of orthographic support and that the observed left-branching preference reflects central aspects of lexical representation and processing.
AB - Compounding is the most common way in which languages can create new words from existing ones. The investigation of how compound words are represented and processed in the mind can therefore reveal fundamental properties of lexical representation and processing. Because of the properties of its morphology and its writing system, Chinese offers a special opportunity for such investigation. In Chinese, it is common for compound words to contain three or more constituents, which are organized into hierarchical structures. Using a lexical decision task, we examined whether the arrangement of such sublexical hierarchies within triconstituent compound words would affect their ease of visual processing. We found that left-branching structures were processed more accurately and more quickly than right-branching ones (left-branching triconstituent compounds are those in which an embedded two-character compound is the modifier and a single character is as the head, as in the English left-branching structure hot dog bun). This processing advantage of left-branching structures was supported by the results of a metalinguistic segmentation task in which participants showed left-branching preferences when presented with special triconstituent compounds which have no feasible branching structure (loanwords and flat structure compounds). In the Chinese character-based writing system, left-branching and right-branching compounds are written exactly the same way. This is in contrast to English in which it is common for the branching direction of a triconstituent compound to be indicated by the presence or absence of a space within the compound structure (e.g., watchdog group, consumer watchdog). Thus, the results from Chinese support the view that hierarchical constituent structure plays a role in processing in the absence of orthographic support and that the observed left-branching preference reflects central aspects of lexical representation and processing.
KW - Chinese; Compounds; Hierarchical structure; Lexical decision; Lexical processing; Morphology
UR - https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41809-022-00108-w.pdf
M3 - Article
SN - 2520-1018
VL - 6
SP - 199
EP - 218
JO - Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
JF - Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
ER -