TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy
T2 - A bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forest
AU - Hily, Emeline
AU - Garcia, Serge
AU - Stenger, Anne
AU - Tu, Gengyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - In France, the implementation of the EU biodiversity conservation policy within the Natura 2000 network combines regulatory tools and voluntary contracting. In this article, we empirically assess the cost-effectiveness of Natura 2000 contracts in forest areas. We simultaneously estimate a cost function for biodiversity conservation and the production set of biodiversity output and timber, while controlling for conservation measures. We show strong substitutability between biodiversity conservation and timber production. Estimate results on the cost-elasticity of biodiversity conservation also suggest the possibility of more ecologically ambitious contracts with lower average costs. Results also show that public owners are able to bear higher opportunity costs than private owners. Our findings may help to formulate policy recommendations in terms of contracts' targeting, likely to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the incentive scheme.
AB - In France, the implementation of the EU biodiversity conservation policy within the Natura 2000 network combines regulatory tools and voluntary contracting. In this article, we empirically assess the cost-effectiveness of Natura 2000 contracts in forest areas. We simultaneously estimate a cost function for biodiversity conservation and the production set of biodiversity output and timber, while controlling for conservation measures. We show strong substitutability between biodiversity conservation and timber production. Estimate results on the cost-elasticity of biodiversity conservation also suggest the possibility of more ecologically ambitious contracts with lower average costs. Results also show that public owners are able to bear higher opportunity costs than private owners. Our findings may help to formulate policy recommendations in terms of contracts' targeting, likely to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the incentive scheme.
KW - Biodiversity index
KW - Cost of biodiversity conservation
KW - Forest
KW - Payment for ecosystem services
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941896414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84941896414
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 119
SP - 197
EP - 208
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -