TY - CHAP
T1 - The Style Historic
T2 - The Gothic Line from the Lake Poets to William Morris
AU - Duggett, Tom
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This chapter discusses the continuities and contrasts between “Gothic Romanticism” and “Victorian Medievalism,” focusing on the linked and parallel figures of Robert Southey and William Morris. Bringing together the perspectives developed in Morris’s works on Gothic architecture in the 1880s and in News from Nowhere (1890), and in Southey’s “black letter” works of the 1810s and 1820s, I argue for the early and late nineteenth-century presence of an alternative “history of the Gothic.” This is Gothic as what Morris called the self-fulfilling and self-canceling “style historic,” articulated either side of the 1840s and the rise of historicism in architecture and “medievalism” in literature; growing out of a determination to have no “copying,” but “either no art at all, or an art which we have made our own.” Where Morris ultimately came to define “Gothic” against the “maundering medievalism” of Tennyson and Rossetti, Southey consistently avoided the category of the “medieval,” despite being an admirer and reviewer of the 1817 work in which the term first appeared. Thus revising received critical and semantic histories of the “Gothic” being subsumed by the “medieval,” the chapter moves to suggest the ongoing significance of “Gothic” as it emerges from this study, as the ground for a more truly historical approach to the art and poetry of the past.
AB - This chapter discusses the continuities and contrasts between “Gothic Romanticism” and “Victorian Medievalism,” focusing on the linked and parallel figures of Robert Southey and William Morris. Bringing together the perspectives developed in Morris’s works on Gothic architecture in the 1880s and in News from Nowhere (1890), and in Southey’s “black letter” works of the 1810s and 1820s, I argue for the early and late nineteenth-century presence of an alternative “history of the Gothic.” This is Gothic as what Morris called the self-fulfilling and self-canceling “style historic,” articulated either side of the 1840s and the rise of historicism in architecture and “medievalism” in literature; growing out of a determination to have no “copying,” but “either no art at all, or an art which we have made our own.” Where Morris ultimately came to define “Gothic” against the “maundering medievalism” of Tennyson and Rossetti, Southey consistently avoided the category of the “medieval,” despite being an admirer and reviewer of the 1817 work in which the term first appeared. Thus revising received critical and semantic histories of the “Gothic” being subsumed by the “medieval,” the chapter moves to suggest the ongoing significance of “Gothic” as it emerges from this study, as the ground for a more truly historical approach to the art and poetry of the past.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131827757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-96832-8_8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-96832-8_8
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85131827757
T3 - Palgrave Gothic
SP - 243
EP - 272
BT - Gothic Romanticism
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -