TY - GEN
T1 - The Prominent Stochastic Optimization Algorithm Settings for the Self-Regulating Feedback Control
AU - Chew, Ing Ming
AU - Wong, W. K.
AU - Abiyasa, Agus Putu
AU - Juwono, Filbert H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This research demonstrates a direct way to obtain determinant variables of the optimization assessment, enabling the optimal control tuning for the closed-loop process. Stochastic optimization approaches such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is analyzed and compared with the performance of manually calculated Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) tuning, which are calculated from the defined algorithms. Nevertheless, the performance of both optimizations might get restricted without proper settings for its determinant variables. This research examines the determinant variables for the optimization assessment. The Upper and Lower boundaries (UB, LB), mutation rate (mu), damping ratio (wdamp), maximum iteration (MaxIt) and population size (nPop) are analyzed and discussed in detail. In the validation, a Level Control (SE-207) module produced the curve responses by applying the controller settings of all the manually calculated PID, GA and PSO algorithms. The result implies improvements in GA and PSO as compared with the manually calculated PID tunings. Moreover, PSO triggered higher overshoots than the GA even though the error values from both optimizations were extremely close. Whereas, GA offers more robust and stabilized responses therefore is favorably selected for the operation of the aforementioned physical module.
AB - This research demonstrates a direct way to obtain determinant variables of the optimization assessment, enabling the optimal control tuning for the closed-loop process. Stochastic optimization approaches such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is analyzed and compared with the performance of manually calculated Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) tuning, which are calculated from the defined algorithms. Nevertheless, the performance of both optimizations might get restricted without proper settings for its determinant variables. This research examines the determinant variables for the optimization assessment. The Upper and Lower boundaries (UB, LB), mutation rate (mu), damping ratio (wdamp), maximum iteration (MaxIt) and population size (nPop) are analyzed and discussed in detail. In the validation, a Level Control (SE-207) module produced the curve responses by applying the controller settings of all the manually calculated PID, GA and PSO algorithms. The result implies improvements in GA and PSO as compared with the manually calculated PID tunings. Moreover, PSO triggered higher overshoots than the GA even though the error values from both optimizations were extremely close. Whereas, GA offers more robust and stabilized responses therefore is favorably selected for the operation of the aforementioned physical module.
KW - Determinant variables
KW - GA
KW - Improved errors and responses
KW - Optimization application
KW - PSO
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207479787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICSCC62041.2024.10690410
DO - 10.1109/ICSCC62041.2024.10690410
M3 - Conference Proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85207479787
T3 - 2024 10th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communication, ICSCC 2024
SP - 128
EP - 133
BT - 2024 10th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communication, ICSCC 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 10th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communication, ICSCC 2024
Y2 - 25 July 2024 through 27 July 2024
ER -