Who's speaking for whom?

Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual*, Bosen Ma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee's mind, thereby involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds] 2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the writer's voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multilayered manner for particular argumentative purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-53
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Historical Pragmatics
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fictive interaction
  • intersubjectivity
  • rhetorical questions
  • the Zhuangzi
  • viewpoint blending

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who's speaking for whom?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this