TY - JOUR
T1 - Veridiction and leadership in transnational populism
T2 - The case of diem25
AU - Fanoulis, Evangelos
AU - Guerra, Simona
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - While research tends to explore questions of power and leadership at the national level, populism in Europe has moved beyond national borders, with an increasing number of transnational movements and organizations. This article investigates the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25) and its leadership’s main speeches. Informed by both discourse theory and Michel Foucault’s work on parrhesia (veridiction), the analysis draws on readings of transnational Euroalternativism and populism, pointing out the conflicting logic of bringing them together at the transnational level. Our findings thus stress the increasing politicization of European integration as an opportunity to mobilize transnational activities, which are based on the populist ‘people vs. the elites’ dichotomy and against Brussels’ unaccountable elites (see FitzGibbon & Guerra, 2019), while indicating the limits of leadership in a populist transnational movement (de Cleen, Moffitt, Panayotu, & Stavrakakis, 2019; Marzolini & Souvlis, 2016).
AB - While research tends to explore questions of power and leadership at the national level, populism in Europe has moved beyond national borders, with an increasing number of transnational movements and organizations. This article investigates the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25) and its leadership’s main speeches. Informed by both discourse theory and Michel Foucault’s work on parrhesia (veridiction), the analysis draws on readings of transnational Euroalternativism and populism, pointing out the conflicting logic of bringing them together at the transnational level. Our findings thus stress the increasing politicization of European integration as an opportunity to mobilize transnational activities, which are based on the populist ‘people vs. the elites’ dichotomy and against Brussels’ unaccountable elites (see FitzGibbon & Guerra, 2019), while indicating the limits of leadership in a populist transnational movement (de Cleen, Moffitt, Panayotu, & Stavrakakis, 2019; Marzolini & Souvlis, 2016).
KW - Discourse analysis
KW - Euroalternativism
KW - Leadership
KW - Parrhesia
KW - Power relations
KW - Transnational populism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084198591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17645/pag.v8i1.2539
DO - 10.17645/pag.v8i1.2539
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084198591
SN - 2183-2463
VL - 8
SP - 217
EP - 225
JO - Politics and Governance
JF - Politics and Governance
IS - 1
ER -