Abstract
This exploratory research paper seeks to consider the problems that may arise in the process of creating deep and lasting partnerships in public-private partnerships (PPPs). It does this by contrasting two case studies of very different PPPs, Copenhagen's metro project and Melbourne City Link. The paper puts forward the case for the author's concern that a deep partnership could lead either to mercantile government or quasi-governmental private parties and thus lead to a diminution of the benefits of PPPs. The paper concludes that these concerns are relevant and need to be considered and guarded against no matter the contract conditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 288-300 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Keywords
- deep partnership
- infrastructure provision
- public-private partnerships
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Swimming or Drowning in the Depths of Partnership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
Sturup, S. (2017). Swimming or Drowning in the Depths of Partnership. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(3), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12241