Sharing Power: The Case for Public Consultations on Trade

Mohsen Al Attar, Miriam Clouthier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1960s, public consultation has emerged as an important democratic tool, allowing governments to inform, debate, and learn from the general public. Since the 1980s, international trade agreements have wielded significant influence over domestic law making, as an ever more 'comprehensive' set of topics is regulated via treaty. In Canada, these two trends have yet to meet. Neither the public nor Parliament is involved in trade policy making, raising concerns about the democratic legitimacy of expansive trade agreements. Through the lens of the recent Canada and European Union (EU) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), this article examines whether trade law's consultation practices can be aligned with those of other federal government departments. We identify five key values that make consultations successful - diversity, education, commitment, accountability, and transparency - and consider the viability of their inclusion in trade consultations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-485
Number of pages21
JournalCanadian Journal of Law and Society
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CETA
  • democracy
  • public consultations
  • representation
  • trade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sharing Power: The Case for Public Consultations on Trade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this