TY - GEN
T1 - Review on Machine Learning Methods for Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction of Lithium-ion Batteries
AU - Su, Nicholas Kwong Howe
AU - Juwono, Filbert H.
AU - Wong, W. K.
AU - Chew, I. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Electric cars are considered as the most ecologically friendly and low-cost means of transportation in the future. As a result, battery technology advancement is of interest for many researchers. Lithium-ion batteries are mostly used for electric vehicles. However, if the Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) drops below capacity degradation, devastating device failure will occur. Hence, it is important to predict the RUL to prevent such problems. Data-driven methods are demonstrated to be superior to model-based methods for this reason. This paper provides a review on Machine Learning (ML), one of the data-driven methods, and summarizes various approaches that have been used in lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries RUL prediction. In addition, comparison of model-based and ML methods are discussed. In particular, the comparison of three ML methods,i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Deep Learning(DL) are also presented. Simulation results show that SVM is able to provide higher RUL accuracy than LSTM and ANN.
AB - Electric cars are considered as the most ecologically friendly and low-cost means of transportation in the future. As a result, battery technology advancement is of interest for many researchers. Lithium-ion batteries are mostly used for electric vehicles. However, if the Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) drops below capacity degradation, devastating device failure will occur. Hence, it is important to predict the RUL to prevent such problems. Data-driven methods are demonstrated to be superior to model-based methods for this reason. This paper provides a review on Machine Learning (ML), one of the data-driven methods, and summarizes various approaches that have been used in lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries RUL prediction. In addition, comparison of model-based and ML methods are discussed. In particular, the comparison of three ML methods,i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Deep Learning(DL) are also presented. Simulation results show that SVM is able to provide higher RUL accuracy than LSTM and ANN.
KW - Lithium-ion Batteries
KW - Machine Learning
KW - RUL
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147020058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/GECOST55694.2022.10010569
DO - 10.1109/GECOST55694.2022.10010569
M3 - Conference Proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85147020058
T3 - 2022 International Conference on Green Energy, Computing and Sustainable Technology, GECOST 2022
SP - 286
EP - 292
BT - 2022 International Conference on Green Energy, Computing and Sustainable Technology, GECOST 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2022 International Conference on Green Energy, Computing and Sustainable Technology, GECOST 2022
Y2 - 26 October 2022 through 28 October 2022
ER -