TY - JOUR
T1 - ReRNet
T2 - A Deep Learning Network for Classifying Blood Cells
AU - Zhu, Ziquan
AU - Wang, Shui Hua
AU - Zhang, Yu Dong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Aims: Blood cell classification helps detect various diseases. However, the current classification model of blood cells cannot always get great results. A network that automatically classifies blood cells can provide doctors with data as one of the criteria for diagnosing patients’ disease types and severity. If doctors diagnose blood cells, doctors could spend lots of time on the diagnosis. The diagnosis progress is very tedious. Doctors can make some mistakes when they feel tired. On the other hand, different doctors may have different points on the same patient. Methods: We propose a ResNet50-based ensemble of randomized neural networks (ReRNet) for blood cell classification. ResNet50 is used as the backbone model for feature extraction. The extracted features are fed to 3 randomized neural networks (RNNs): Schmidt neural network, extreme learning machine, and dRVFL. The outputs of the ReRNet are the ensemble of these 3 RNNs based on the majority voting mechanism. The 5 × 5-fold cross-validation is applied to validate the proposed network. Results: The average-accuracy, average-sensitivity, average-precision, and average-F1-score are 99.97%, 99.96%, 99.98%, and 99.97%, respectively. Conclusions: The ReRNet is compared with 4 state-of-the-art methods and achieves the best classification performance. The ReRNet is an effective method for blood cell classification based on these results.
AB - Aims: Blood cell classification helps detect various diseases. However, the current classification model of blood cells cannot always get great results. A network that automatically classifies blood cells can provide doctors with data as one of the criteria for diagnosing patients’ disease types and severity. If doctors diagnose blood cells, doctors could spend lots of time on the diagnosis. The diagnosis progress is very tedious. Doctors can make some mistakes when they feel tired. On the other hand, different doctors may have different points on the same patient. Methods: We propose a ResNet50-based ensemble of randomized neural networks (ReRNet) for blood cell classification. ResNet50 is used as the backbone model for feature extraction. The extracted features are fed to 3 randomized neural networks (RNNs): Schmidt neural network, extreme learning machine, and dRVFL. The outputs of the ReRNet are the ensemble of these 3 RNNs based on the majority voting mechanism. The 5 × 5-fold cross-validation is applied to validate the proposed network. Results: The average-accuracy, average-sensitivity, average-precision, and average-F1-score are 99.97%, 99.96%, 99.98%, and 99.97%, respectively. Conclusions: The ReRNet is compared with 4 state-of-the-art methods and achieves the best classification performance. The ReRNet is an effective method for blood cell classification based on these results.
KW - ResNet50
KW - blood cells
KW - convolutional neural network
KW - randomized neural network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151109749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/15330338231165856
DO - 10.1177/15330338231165856
M3 - Article
C2 - 36977533
AN - SCOPUS:85151109749
SN - 1533-0346
VL - 22
JO - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment
ER -