TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical simulation of heat transfer during spark plasma sintering of zirconium diboride
AU - Sakkaki, Milad
AU - Sadegh Moghanlou, Farhad
AU - Vajdi, Mohammad
AU - Shahedi Asl, Mehdi
AU - Mohammadi, Mohsen
AU - Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Temperature and electric current distributions in the spark plasma sintering process of a ZrB2 sample were simulated using finite element method. The main source of heating in spark plasma sintering is perceived as the Joule heating effect, which is a result of electric current distribution in the setup. Two sets of governing equations including the electric charge and energy conversion are utilized to obtain the temperature distribution. The acquired results for the sintering process were compared with Al2O3 sintered counterpart propounding two different mechanisms of heating proceeding. Al2O3 is an electrical insulator; therefore, the operating electric current concentrates in the graphite die close to the sample, whereas the ZrB2 is an electric conductor resulting in a more uniform current distribution. In the non–conductive sample, heat is generally generated in the graphite die and conducted to the sample. Both Joule heating effect and thermal conduction from the die to the sample are involved in the sintering of ZrB2. The temperature distribution in electric resistant materials is more uniform than electric conductor cases. This is attributed to the different dominant heating mechanism of materials.
AB - Temperature and electric current distributions in the spark plasma sintering process of a ZrB2 sample were simulated using finite element method. The main source of heating in spark plasma sintering is perceived as the Joule heating effect, which is a result of electric current distribution in the setup. Two sets of governing equations including the electric charge and energy conversion are utilized to obtain the temperature distribution. The acquired results for the sintering process were compared with Al2O3 sintered counterpart propounding two different mechanisms of heating proceeding. Al2O3 is an electrical insulator; therefore, the operating electric current concentrates in the graphite die close to the sample, whereas the ZrB2 is an electric conductor resulting in a more uniform current distribution. In the non–conductive sample, heat is generally generated in the graphite die and conducted to the sample. Both Joule heating effect and thermal conduction from the die to the sample are involved in the sintering of ZrB2. The temperature distribution in electric resistant materials is more uniform than electric conductor cases. This is attributed to the different dominant heating mechanism of materials.
KW - Heat transfer
KW - Numerical modelling
KW - Spark plasma sintering
KW - ZrB
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075427806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.240
DO - 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.240
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075427806
SN - 0272-8842
VL - 46
SP - 4998
EP - 5007
JO - Ceramics International
JF - Ceramics International
IS - 4
ER -