Mandatory Versus Incentive-Based State Zoning Reform Policiesfor Affordable Housing in the United States:A Comparative Assessment

Tej Kumar Karki*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To break the chain of exclusionary zoning and produce affordable housing, mandatory state zoning reform policies have been in place for a couple decades in the United States. Their success is often constrained by local resistance and noncompliance. Some scholars argue that the lack of incentives to communities for affordable housing production is one of the main reasons for their resistance to state mandates. At present, no incentive-based state zoning reform policy is at work except in Massachusetts. Inclusionary zoning policies do offer incentives to developers but not to communities. This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of mandatory state policies and Massachusetts's incentive-based policy and offers policy insights for the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-262
Number of pages29
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • affordable housing development
  • incentives for zoning reform
  • smart growth zoning overlay district
  • state mandates

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mandatory Versus Incentive-Based State Zoning Reform Policiesfor Affordable Housing in the United States:A Comparative Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this