Is burst loss worse than random loss for video transmission?

Jimin Xiao*, Tammam Tillod, Chunyu Lin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book or Report/Conference proceedingConference Proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

Many papers have shown that burst loss causes more severe damage to the reconstructed video quality than random loss for the same packet loss rate. With traditional interleaving methods, the consecutive lost packet positions will be interleaved to random positions, and after interleaving, the PSNR of burst loss can be close to the PSNR of random loss for the same packet loss rate. In this paper, a novel slice reorder and packetization (SRP) approach is proposed which fully utilizes the temporal correlation between slices in successive frames. Theoretical analysis is presented that explains why with the proposed approach, burst loss can be better than random loss for the same packet loss rate. The effect of the proposed approach is validated with H.264/AVC coded video. The simulation results show that with the proposed approach, the PSNR of the burst loss can be up to more than 2dB higher than random loss without adding any redundant information.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2011 18th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, Proceedings IWSSIP 2011
Pages213-216
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event2011 18th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, IWSSIP 2011 - Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Duration: 16 Jun 201118 Jun 2011

Publication series

NameInternational Conference on Systems, Signals, and Image Processing
ISSN (Print)2157-8672
ISSN (Electronic)2157-8702

Conference

Conference2011 18th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, IWSSIP 2011
Country/TerritoryBosnia and Herzegovina
CitySarajevo
Period16/06/1118/06/11

Keywords

  • H.264/AVC
  • Rate Distortion
  • burst loss
  • error resilience
  • random loss
  • slice

Cite this