Improving reflective practice: a documentation rubric for mentoring preservice and in-service teachers

Carolyn Pope Edwards*, Erin Hamel, Jennifer Leeper Miller, Lixin Ren

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Professionals in the field of early childhood are encouraged to demonstrate reflective perspectives of their work supported by pedagogical documentation. The purpose of this article is to introduce a rubric developed for preservice and inservice teachers to improve documentation and reflection. The rubric’s four dimensions: visible learning, powerful story, emotional impact, and visual impact range from novice to expert level. The rubric is not meant to create prescribed documentation or to be used as an evaluation or assessment. Instead, it is a tool to sharpen critical focus for reflection and to challenge teachers to examine and improve their documentation. We include a review of the Reggio Emilia approach to pedagogical documentation and reflective process, an explanatory account of how the rubric was developed, and reflections from implementing the rubric with preservice teachers. We also offer reflective questions and examples to aid in improving documentation and reflection. Recommendations for practice include use as a tool for selfreflection and guided collaborative reflection in small groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-17
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Early Childhood Teacher Education
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving reflective practice: a documentation rubric for mentoring preservice and in-service teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this