Abstract
We examine whether systematic higher moments capture beta asymmetry in an asset pricing model whereby the conditional beta of a risky asset increases (decreases) during a bear (bull) market state. We first provide a simple conceptual outline from the microeconomic literature to show that beta asymmetry is driven by time-varying higher-order risk preferences (prudence and temperance) across different market states. We then empirically relate these higher-order risk preferences to systematic skewness and systematic kurtosis. We find that beta asymmetry in Australian stock returns cannot be explained by Carhart (1997) 4-factor model but is subsumed by systematic higher moments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 779-807 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Accounting and Finance |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Asset pricing
- Australian stock returns
- Beta risk
- Kurtosis
- Skewness