Abstract
This paper presents the first formal comparison of Value at risk (VaR) forecasting performance across various high-frequency volatility models and conventional benchmarks using daily data in the crude oil futures market. Our analysis reveals the following key findings:(1) High-frequency data significantly enhance the accuracy of VaR forecasts. Specifically, the realized-GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) model that incorporates 5-s realized bipower variation (BPV) outperforms all other models. (2) Not all realized measures are equally effective for VaR forecasting. The 5-s BPV model consistently outperforms other realized measures in forecasting VaR. (3) The choice of sampling frequency plays a crucial role in the performance of realized measures when forecasting VaR. (4) Many more sophisticated realized measures fail to surpass the simple 5-min realized variance (RV) model in forecasting VaR in the crude oil futures market.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 279-296 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Management Science and Engineering |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- Crude oil futures market
- Realized measures
- Sampling frequency
- Value at risk