TY - JOUR
T1 - Delta management in evolution
T2 - a comparative review of the Yangtze River Delta and Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt Delta
AU - Nolf, Christian
AU - Xie, Yuting
AU - Vannoorbeeck, Florence
AU - Chen, Bing
N1 - Funding Information:
The research presented in this paper has benefited from the support of the Jiangsu Province Program of Science and Technology (BK20151244), the Young International Scientist program of the National Science Foundation of China (51550110235), the Research Development Fund of Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (RDF-14-03-23), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY19E080001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019QNA6023). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Japan Section of the Regional Science Association International.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - This paper aims to compare the Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt Delta in Europe and the Taihu Basin part of the Yangtze River Delta in China from a long-term historical perspective. Urbanized deltas are among the most prosperous and populated regions in the world, but also the most vulnerable. To cope with growing uncertainty, their systematic comparison has become instrumental in building mutual learning on the theory and practice of spatial planning and water resource management in such vulnerable contexts. Based on a systematic comparative mapping approach of Delta Urbanism with critical review of policies, this research highlights important similarities between these two deltas in terms of physical characteristics, dense occupation, and management history evolving from a decentralized polder-based system to a centralized control model, and a recent adoption of integrated and adaptive water management strategies. On the other hand, the comparison reveals distinct management focuses in current delta plans, as well as contrasting approaches to public participation and historical hydraulic landscapes. It is found from this comparative study that, beyond the socio-cultural specificities that can explain the distinct management practice of each region, the systematic use of mapping as a visualization and communication tool would facilitate integrative and adaptive delta management.
AB - This paper aims to compare the Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt Delta in Europe and the Taihu Basin part of the Yangtze River Delta in China from a long-term historical perspective. Urbanized deltas are among the most prosperous and populated regions in the world, but also the most vulnerable. To cope with growing uncertainty, their systematic comparison has become instrumental in building mutual learning on the theory and practice of spatial planning and water resource management in such vulnerable contexts. Based on a systematic comparative mapping approach of Delta Urbanism with critical review of policies, this research highlights important similarities between these two deltas in terms of physical characteristics, dense occupation, and management history evolving from a decentralized polder-based system to a centralized control model, and a recent adoption of integrated and adaptive water management strategies. On the other hand, the comparison reveals distinct management focuses in current delta plans, as well as contrasting approaches to public participation and historical hydraulic landscapes. It is found from this comparative study that, beyond the socio-cultural specificities that can explain the distinct management practice of each region, the systematic use of mapping as a visualization and communication tool would facilitate integrative and adaptive delta management.
KW - Delta urbanism
KW - Integrated water resource management
KW - Mapping
KW - Spatial planning
KW - Taihu Basin
KW - Visualization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093922969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s41685-020-00177-1
DO - 10.1007/s41685-020-00177-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85093922969
SN - 2509-7954
VL - 5
SP - 597
EP - 624
JO - Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
JF - Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
IS - 2
ER -