TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep learning for polymer scaffold bioimage analysis
T2 - Opportunities and challenges
AU - Sun, Jie
AU - Yao, Kai
AU - Zhu, Hui
AU - Huang, Kaizhu
AU - Huang, Dejian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Significant efforts have been made to advance bioprinted scaffold research in cell biology, tissue engineering, and drug screening studies. Ideal scaffolds should demonstrate suitable mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, and bioactivities. However, the design and preparation of such scaffolds are challenging. Imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging, micro-computed tomography, ultrasound imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser scanning microscopy, are commonly used to visualize the interior architecture of bioprinted scaffolds, as well as the surrounding cells and tissues. The obtained bioimages provide direct insight into the biological functionalities of the scaffold, though their interpretation may lead to differing viewpoints and even debates. This review explores deep learning (DL) methods employed for image analysis, including restoration, segmentation, and classification. First, current DL methods for biological image processing are summarized, such as convolutional neural network, U-Net, and generative adversarial network. The corresponding outcomes of these methods reveal cell–scaffold and tissue–scaffold interactions, providing guidance for scaffold design in specific applications. Thereafter, the challenges and limitations of DL applications are highlighted, such as building DL models using smaller bioimage datasets, interpreting DL models, vision-language model-guided bioimage analysis, and developing intelligent analysis platforms. Hence, this review would mark a paradigm shift in polymer scaffold designs and the associated performance.
AB - Significant efforts have been made to advance bioprinted scaffold research in cell biology, tissue engineering, and drug screening studies. Ideal scaffolds should demonstrate suitable mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, and bioactivities. However, the design and preparation of such scaffolds are challenging. Imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging, micro-computed tomography, ultrasound imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser scanning microscopy, are commonly used to visualize the interior architecture of bioprinted scaffolds, as well as the surrounding cells and tissues. The obtained bioimages provide direct insight into the biological functionalities of the scaffold, though their interpretation may lead to differing viewpoints and even debates. This review explores deep learning (DL) methods employed for image analysis, including restoration, segmentation, and classification. First, current DL methods for biological image processing are summarized, such as convolutional neural network, U-Net, and generative adversarial network. The corresponding outcomes of these methods reveal cell–scaffold and tissue–scaffold interactions, providing guidance for scaffold design in specific applications. Thereafter, the challenges and limitations of DL applications are highlighted, such as building DL models using smaller bioimage datasets, interpreting DL models, vision-language model-guided bioimage analysis, and developing intelligent analysis platforms. Hence, this review would mark a paradigm shift in polymer scaffold designs and the associated performance.
KW - Bioimage analysis
KW - Deep learning
KW - Imaging modalities
KW - Machine learning
KW - Polymer scaffold
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004678354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.36922/ijb.4035
DO - 10.36922/ijb.4035
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105004678354
SN - 2424-8002
VL - 11
SP - 16
EP - 33
JO - International Journal of Bioprinting
JF - International Journal of Bioprinting
IS - 2
ER -