TY - JOUR
T1 - Controlling of compliant grinding for low-rigidity components
AU - Yang, Yue
AU - Li, Haonan
AU - Liao, Zhirong
AU - Axinte, Dragos
AU - Zhu, Wule
AU - Beaucamp, Anthony
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - The machining of low-rigidity components (e.g. thin-walled) with compliant tools presents accuracy challenges as both sides in contact are being deformed. The controlling method presented in this paper enables, for the first time, to obtain the desired and uniform material removal rate by controlling the nominal tool offset when two bodies (workpiece and tool) are compliant in grinding. A contact deformation model is proposed to predict the relation between the nominal and actual tool offsets. The function of nominal tool offsets and material removal rates is obtained based on the calibration tests. Spot grinding tests have been performed for the validation of the calculated material removal rates, normal grinding forces and spot sizes, presenting position-dependent characteristics. The controlling method has been tested for the case of continuous grinding the whole area of a circular aluminium thin wall. The surfaces ground under the time-variant tool offsets (proposed approach) reach the desired removal depth with an average error of ≤10% and achieve 11.2 μm–24.2 μm (P–V) accuracy in the elastic domain, compared with the error of 76.8%~113.7% and accuracy of 42.6 μm–50.1 μm (P–V) in the circumstance of constant tool offsets (conventional approach).
AB - The machining of low-rigidity components (e.g. thin-walled) with compliant tools presents accuracy challenges as both sides in contact are being deformed. The controlling method presented in this paper enables, for the first time, to obtain the desired and uniform material removal rate by controlling the nominal tool offset when two bodies (workpiece and tool) are compliant in grinding. A contact deformation model is proposed to predict the relation between the nominal and actual tool offsets. The function of nominal tool offsets and material removal rates is obtained based on the calibration tests. Spot grinding tests have been performed for the validation of the calculated material removal rates, normal grinding forces and spot sizes, presenting position-dependent characteristics. The controlling method has been tested for the case of continuous grinding the whole area of a circular aluminium thin wall. The surfaces ground under the time-variant tool offsets (proposed approach) reach the desired removal depth with an average error of ≤10% and achieve 11.2 μm–24.2 μm (P–V) accuracy in the elastic domain, compared with the error of 76.8%~113.7% and accuracy of 42.6 μm–50.1 μm (P–V) in the circumstance of constant tool offsets (conventional approach).
KW - Compliant grinding
KW - Material removal rate
KW - Thin wall machining
KW - Tool offset
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082113344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103543
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103543
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85082113344
SN - 0890-6955
VL - 152
JO - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
JF - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
M1 - 103543
ER -