Biological control mitigates spread of vector-borne plant pathogens

Kris A.G. Wyckhuys*, Yi Zou, David W. Crowder, Evie Adriani, Annabelle B. Albaytar, Marie Joy B. Beltran, Ibtissem Ben Fekih, Carolina Camargo-Gil, Filomena C. Filomena, Lizette Cicero, Yelitza C. Colmenarez, Claudia M. Cuellar-Palacios, Thomas Dubois, Sanford D. Eigenbrode, Frederic Francis, Alberto Fereres, Khalid Haddi, Fathiya M. Khamis, Cécile Le Lann, Anne Le RalecLorena Lopez, Baoqian Lyu, James Montoya-Lerma, Karen Muñoz-Cardenas, Ihsan Nurkomar, Paola A. Palmeros-Suarez, Jermaine D. Perier, Ricardo Ramírez-Romero, Sacha Roudine, Marcio M. Sanches, Francisco J. Sanchez-Garcia, Freddiewebb B. Signabon, Joan van Baaren, Carlos Vásquez, Pengjun Xu, Yanhui Lu, Maged Elkahky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Diseases caused by vector-borne plant pathogens cause adverse impacts on yield resilience, food security, and farmer livelihoods, which are bound to aggravate under global change. Biological control is routinely discounted as a mitigation strategy for plant diseases, partially due to scarce and inconclusive empirical support. Here, using curated field survey data for 58 persistently or semi-persistently transmitted pathogens, we employ a multi-method approach to assess the role of resident (i.e., naturally occurring) biological control agents in these pathosystems. Our meta-analyses show how in planta pathogen incidence is strongly affected by vector abundance and infectivity. Meanwhile, biological control agent density negatively affects vector abundance and slows vector population build-up. Together, these relationships suggest that biological control lessens pathogen incidence by reducing vector abundance, though a paucity of data impedes direct, empirical demonstration of this effect. In particular, bipartite (mainly vector × pathogen) interactions have only been uncovered under field conditions for less than half of focal pathosystems. More so, just 5 % of studies simultaneously reported pathogen, vector, and biological control agent densities. Our study contests the long-standing dogma that arthropod-vectored pathogens cannot be mitigated through biological control, and accentuates how observational or manipulative field studies are imperative to grasp its full potential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109683
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume388
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • Agroecology
  • Biological control agent-vector-virus interactions
  • Disease ecology
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Vector-borne pathogens

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biological control mitigates spread of vector-borne plant pathogens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this