TY - GEN
T1 - An Investigation of the Impact of Normalization Schemes on GCN Modelling
AU - Dai, Chuan
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Wei, Yajuan
AU - Chen, Minsi
AU - Liu, Ying
AU - Cao, Yanlong
AU - Xu, Zhijie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In the modelling of graph convolutional networks (GCNs), typically based on the adjacency matrix of the graph, most studies opt for the symmetric normalized Laplacian as the normalization method for the adjacency matrix. However, there has been little research discussing the impact of alternative normalization methods on the performance of GCN deep learning tasks. Therefore, this paper focuses on the performance of two normalization approaches (symmetric normalized Laplacian and random walk normalized Laplacian) in GCN's node classification task. Additionally, to effectively control the scale and parameters of the network, this study combines a GCN sparsification scheme to draw conclusions. Experimental results on three benchmark graph network datasets indicate that the symmetric normalized Laplacian generally achieves better performance in most cases. However, the results also depend on the selection of sparsification methods and the setting of hyperparameters.
AB - In the modelling of graph convolutional networks (GCNs), typically based on the adjacency matrix of the graph, most studies opt for the symmetric normalized Laplacian as the normalization method for the adjacency matrix. However, there has been little research discussing the impact of alternative normalization methods on the performance of GCN deep learning tasks. Therefore, this paper focuses on the performance of two normalization approaches (symmetric normalized Laplacian and random walk normalized Laplacian) in GCN's node classification task. Additionally, to effectively control the scale and parameters of the network, this study combines a GCN sparsification scheme to draw conclusions. Experimental results on three benchmark graph network datasets indicate that the symmetric normalized Laplacian generally achieves better performance in most cases. However, the results also depend on the selection of sparsification methods and the setting of hyperparameters.
KW - GCN
KW - graph Laplacian
KW - node classification
KW - normalization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208615066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICAC61394.2024.10718756
DO - 10.1109/ICAC61394.2024.10718756
M3 - Conference Proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85208615066
T3 - ICAC 2024 - 29th International Conference on Automation and Computing
BT - ICAC 2024 - 29th International Conference on Automation and Computing
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 29th International Conference on Automation and Computing, ICAC 2024
Y2 - 28 August 2024 through 30 August 2024
ER -