A three tier evaluation mixed method research model aiming to select an adequate MCDA method for public sector procurement

Mohamed Adil, Miguel Baptista Nunes, G. C.Alex Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the three tier mixed-method (TTMM) design, discusses it in relation to more traditionalmixed method approaches and presents a summary of the findings of the research that originated it. This research designemerged from a project that aimed to identify a suitable multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method according tolegal, operational and performance requirements associated with public procurement in the Maldives. This design followeda sequential method and perspective triangulation that encompasses three different methods, namely a systematic literaturereview, focus group interviews and a quantitative performance analysis. The design was found to be particularly usefulin enabling the systematic and evidence-based selection of one MCDA method out of more than 80 potential candidates. TTMM as a general mixed method research framework is applicable to similar research studies where the understandingof legal, operational and performance factors inform the selection of IT artefacts in specific contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-189
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Multiple Research Approaches
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Comparative analysis
  • Evaluation research
  • Mixed methods
  • Multi-criteria decision analysis
  • Public sector procurement
  • Research design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A three tier evaluation mixed method research model aiming to select an adequate MCDA method for public sector procurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this