TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Applying Image Processing and Deep Learning in Acne Region Extraction
AU - Zhang, Chengrui
AU - Huang, Guangyao
AU - Yao, Kai
AU - Leach, Mark
AU - Sun, Jie
AU - Huang, Kaizhu
AU - Zhou, Xiaoyun
AU - Yuan, Liqiong
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was partially supported by the following: Municipal Key Lab for Wireless Broadband Access Technologies in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, for research facilities; Key Program Special Fund in Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University under Grant KSF-E-37.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Image and Graphics.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Quantifying acne on face images is considered as a challenging task due to the complex skin surfaces, irregular edges and diverse appearances of acnes. A key in this campaign relies upon segmenting lesion areas precisely in the captured images against varying Imaging situation, e.g., illumination, skin condition, imaging angles and etc. To processing these acne data, either theory-driven image processing methods or data-driven deep learning (DL) based methods are commonly utilized in practice. In order to investigate the advantage and shortcoming of the abovementioned two technology roadmaps in quantifying acne task, we develop an image processing pipeline, and make comparison with the state-of-the-art DL methods such as SegFormer, UNETR, Swin-UNet and TransUNet using small data set. The quantitative comparison results reveal that TransUNet performs better in terms of precision, recall, F1-Score and accuracy, whilst image processing methods still have potential in practice due to its annotation-free.
AB - Quantifying acne on face images is considered as a challenging task due to the complex skin surfaces, irregular edges and diverse appearances of acnes. A key in this campaign relies upon segmenting lesion areas precisely in the captured images against varying Imaging situation, e.g., illumination, skin condition, imaging angles and etc. To processing these acne data, either theory-driven image processing methods or data-driven deep learning (DL) based methods are commonly utilized in practice. In order to investigate the advantage and shortcoming of the abovementioned two technology roadmaps in quantifying acne task, we develop an image processing pipeline, and make comparison with the state-of-the-art DL methods such as SegFormer, UNETR, Swin-UNet and TransUNet using small data set. The quantitative comparison results reveal that TransUNet performs better in terms of precision, recall, F1-Score and accuracy, whilst image processing methods still have potential in practice due to its annotation-free.
KW - deep learning
KW - image processing
KW - image segmentation method
KW - neural network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140436584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18178/joig.10.4.166-171
DO - 10.18178/joig.10.4.166-171
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140436584
SN - 2301-3699
VL - 10
SP - 166
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Image and Graphics(United Kingdom)
JF - Journal of Image and Graphics(United Kingdom)
IS - 4
ER -