TY - JOUR
T1 - A City Profile of Liverpool
AU - Sykes, Olivier
AU - Brown, Jonathan
AU - Cocks, Matthew
AU - Shaw, David
AU - Couch, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
Perhaps most significantly, Merseyside and Liverpool City Council also acquired substantial European Union support, gaining Objective One structural fund status between 1994 and 2006 ( Boland, 2000; Evans, 2002 ). This resulted in over £1.3 billion of public sector money (European and national) being allocated and spent on economic development funds in the conurbation during this period. There were two key components of the European Objective One programme which was targeted at lagging regions that had less than 75% of the European average GDP per capita. The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) helped to rebuild the physical infrastructure of the city, and the European Social Fund (ESF) was designed to improve ‘human capital’. These two elements in combination were to make the city more attractive for private investment. The institutional structures formed to administer these funds and deliver projects also became important components of the emerging governance framework, which was critical in helping to rebuild the fractured governance capacity of the city itself, but also trust with central government. The Mersey Partnership (TMP) was established during the early 1990s to promote Merseyside – and later, the ‘Liverpool City Region’ – to potential inward investors and later also took on the role of tourism management for the conurbation.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - This Profile focuses on patterns of growth, decline and renewal in Liverpool (UK) over the past 200. years. In this period, the city has seen extremes of both prosperity and decline. It pioneered many of the elements of the modern industrial metropolis, only to deurbanise during a ruinous late 20th century decline, halving its population. The centre has now been successfully re-urbanised and the city population is growing, but spatial inequalities remain intense. As a focus for policy remedies from across the ideological spectrum, Liverpool offers an instructive archive of approaches of continued relevance and interest.Liverpool emerged as a modern global city, based around new systems of international trade and capital during the 18th and 19th centuries. Growth and wealth were manifested physically in grand architectural landscapes and the planned development of often pioneering modern urban infrastructure such as railways, parks, docklands and public housing. Liverpool was among the earliest places to face acute social challenges characteristic of the industrial city. Its universal importance is reflected in UNESCO World Heritage Site status for significant portions of its docklands and downtown area.The city's population peaked in the 1930s with much of the subsequent century witnessing an accelerating reversal of the city's fortunes, as a result of unfavourable economic restructuring, war damage and key planning decisions. Throughout the 20th century Liverpool has been an early test bed for urban policies, sometimes applied from opposing poles of the ideological spectrum. In the switch from planned growth to managing and reversing decline, there have been numerous efforts to 'regenerate' the city's economic, physical and social fabric, many have been successful, whilst others have been seen as deeply damaging, making Liverpool something of an 'urban laboratory' worthy of careful consideration and reflection.Informed by the historical trajectory outlined above, this Profile firstly discusses Liverpool's rise to prominence as a global trade centre in the 18th and 19th centuries. Secondly, challenges faced during the 20th century are considered. Finally, the recent history of redevelopment and regeneration is reviewed and followed by reflections on the present city and its future prospects.
AB - This Profile focuses on patterns of growth, decline and renewal in Liverpool (UK) over the past 200. years. In this period, the city has seen extremes of both prosperity and decline. It pioneered many of the elements of the modern industrial metropolis, only to deurbanise during a ruinous late 20th century decline, halving its population. The centre has now been successfully re-urbanised and the city population is growing, but spatial inequalities remain intense. As a focus for policy remedies from across the ideological spectrum, Liverpool offers an instructive archive of approaches of continued relevance and interest.Liverpool emerged as a modern global city, based around new systems of international trade and capital during the 18th and 19th centuries. Growth and wealth were manifested physically in grand architectural landscapes and the planned development of often pioneering modern urban infrastructure such as railways, parks, docklands and public housing. Liverpool was among the earliest places to face acute social challenges characteristic of the industrial city. Its universal importance is reflected in UNESCO World Heritage Site status for significant portions of its docklands and downtown area.The city's population peaked in the 1930s with much of the subsequent century witnessing an accelerating reversal of the city's fortunes, as a result of unfavourable economic restructuring, war damage and key planning decisions. Throughout the 20th century Liverpool has been an early test bed for urban policies, sometimes applied from opposing poles of the ideological spectrum. In the switch from planned growth to managing and reversing decline, there have been numerous efforts to 'regenerate' the city's economic, physical and social fabric, many have been successful, whilst others have been seen as deeply damaging, making Liverpool something of an 'urban laboratory' worthy of careful consideration and reflection.Informed by the historical trajectory outlined above, this Profile firstly discusses Liverpool's rise to prominence as a global trade centre in the 18th and 19th centuries. Secondly, challenges faced during the 20th century are considered. Finally, the recent history of redevelopment and regeneration is reviewed and followed by reflections on the present city and its future prospects.
KW - Cultural heritage
KW - Economic restructuring
KW - Port-related urban development
KW - Regeneration
KW - Spatial planning
KW - Urban governance
KW - Urban shrinkage
KW - World Heritage Site
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885290633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84885290633
SN - 0264-2751
VL - 35
SP - 299
EP - 318
JO - Cities
JF - Cities
ER -