Tyrosine negatively affects flexible-like behaviour under cognitively demanding conditions

Anna Robson*, Lee Wei Lim, Luca Aquili

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The catecholaminergic precursor to dopamine, tyrosine, is an important modulator of cognitive performance. A number of studies have demonstrated that the beneficial effects of tyrosine on cognitive performance are most pronounced when individuals are exposed to stressful situations, such as hypothermia. However, little is known about whether manipulation of stress using non-aversive stimuli, such as cognitive demand, can also bring about similar improvements. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment to test the effects of tyrosine administration and cognitive load (low or high) on cognitive flexibility, a measure known to be influenced by catecholaminergic function. A total of 70 healthy volunteers completed a baseline cognitive flexibility test (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: WCST). Participants were given a dose of either tyrosine (2.0 g) or placebo (cellulose) and subject to either low cognitive load (simple reaction time task) or high cognitive load (digit memory span task), immediately followed by a WCST for a second time. Results: Contrary to expectations, we found that instead of ameliorating performance under the high cognitive load condition, tyrosine worsened cognitive flexibility. Limitations: Physiological marker of stress was not measured. Conclusions: Our results suggest that aversive stressors and cognitive demand modulate the effects of tyrosine on cognitive performance in a differential manner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-333
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume260
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive flexibility
  • Dopamine
  • Tyrosine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tyrosine negatively affects flexible-like behaviour under cognitively demanding conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this