The Messy-Niche algorithm used for image super-resolution

Ji Xi*, Xiao Wei Zhao, Xue Wu Zhang, Yu Dong Zhang, Shui Hua Wang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book or Report/Conference proceedingConference Proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

Two problems will be met with while directly using simple genetic algorithm to solve image interpolation: one is how many bits are needed for difference-chromosome coding. Setting it too large will increase implementation spending while making it too small will evolve into local minimum. The other is premature, if some individuals are most dominant in current population, they will emphasize their superiority in future evolution, so the diversity is restrained and evolution will be plunged into local minimum. This paper investigates messy algorithm and niche algorithm which can easily remedy the two shortcomings above. For the purpose of extracting an ultimate algorithm, messy algorithm and niche algorithm are combined. Experiments on the application of image super-resolution demonstrate the algorithm proposed has better performance than messy algorithm or niche algorithm used alone.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, WCSP 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, WCSP 2009 - Nanjing, China
Duration: 13 Nov 200915 Nov 2009

Publication series

Name2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, WCSP 2009

Conference

Conference2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, WCSP 2009
Country/TerritoryChina
CityNanjing
Period13/11/0915/11/09

Keywords

  • Genetic algorithm
  • Image restoration
  • Messy algorithm
  • Niche algorithm
  • Super-resolution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Messy-Niche algorithm used for image super-resolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this