The concept of roughness in fluvial hydraulics and its formulation in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical simulation models

Hervé Morvan*, Donald Knight, Nigel Wright, Xiaonan Tang, Amanda Crossley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of the meaning of the term "roughness" in the field of fluvial hydraulics, and how it is often formulated as a "resistance to flow" term in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical models. It looks at how roughness is traditionally characterized in both experimental and numerical fields, and subsequently challenges the definitions that currently exist. In the end, the authors wonder: Is roughness well understood and defined at all? Such a question raises a number of concerns in both research and practice; for example, how does one modeller use the roughness value from an experimental piece of work, or how does a practitioner identify the roughness value of a particular river channel? The authors indicate that roughness may not be uniquely defined, that there may be distinct "experimental" and "numerical" roughness values, and that in each field nuances exist associated with the context in which these values are used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-208
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Flow
  • Modelling
  • Resistance
  • Rivers
  • Roughness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The concept of roughness in fluvial hydraulics and its formulation in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical simulation models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this