TY - JOUR
T1 - The concept of roughness in fluvial hydraulics and its formulation in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical simulation models
AU - Morvan, Hervé
AU - Knight, Donald
AU - Wright, Nigel
AU - Tang, Xiaonan
AU - Crossley, Amanda
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for their financial support through Grants GR/R43716/01 and GR/R43723/01 on “Modelling of open channel flow to illustrate the effects of channel shape and heterogeneous roughness” which enabled this work to be undertaken.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - This paper gives an overview of the meaning of the term "roughness" in the field of fluvial hydraulics, and how it is often formulated as a "resistance to flow" term in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical models. It looks at how roughness is traditionally characterized in both experimental and numerical fields, and subsequently challenges the definitions that currently exist. In the end, the authors wonder: Is roughness well understood and defined at all? Such a question raises a number of concerns in both research and practice; for example, how does one modeller use the roughness value from an experimental piece of work, or how does a practitioner identify the roughness value of a particular river channel? The authors indicate that roughness may not be uniquely defined, that there may be distinct "experimental" and "numerical" roughness values, and that in each field nuances exist associated with the context in which these values are used.
AB - This paper gives an overview of the meaning of the term "roughness" in the field of fluvial hydraulics, and how it is often formulated as a "resistance to flow" term in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical models. It looks at how roughness is traditionally characterized in both experimental and numerical fields, and subsequently challenges the definitions that currently exist. In the end, the authors wonder: Is roughness well understood and defined at all? Such a question raises a number of concerns in both research and practice; for example, how does one modeller use the roughness value from an experimental piece of work, or how does a practitioner identify the roughness value of a particular river channel? The authors indicate that roughness may not be uniquely defined, that there may be distinct "experimental" and "numerical" roughness values, and that in each field nuances exist associated with the context in which these values are used.
KW - Flow
KW - Modelling
KW - Resistance
KW - Rivers
KW - Roughness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43849098033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521855
DO - 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521855
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:43849098033
SN - 0022-1686
VL - 46
SP - 191
EP - 208
JO - Journal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques
JF - Journal of Hydraulic Research/De Recherches Hydrauliques
IS - 2
ER -