Productivity-diversity relationships for stream invertebrates differ geographically

Jonathan D. Tonkin, Russell G. Death, José Barquín

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


More productive environments typically have more species, although the specific form of this relationship is unclear and can vary with spatial scale. This relationship has received little direct attention in lotic systems, and thus the nature of the relationship is unclear, as is any effect of spatial scale. We examined the link between stream primary productivity and macroinvertebrate diversity in Spain and New Zealand and hypothesized that macroinvertebrate diversity would increase log-linearly with increasing productivity in both regions. We sampled 24 streams in Cantabria, Spain, and 24 in the central North Island, New Zealand. Algal primary productivity was approximately three times higher in Spanish streams, but taxonomic richness of invertebrates did not differ between the regions. Richness and Shannon diversity only responded to productivity in the New Zealand streams, exhibiting the predicted log-linear increase. In the Spanish streams, only the total number of individuals increased with productivity. However, when plotted on the same axes, richness in the Spanish streams simply occurred on the linear portion of the graph to the right of the New Zealand streams. We speculate that productivity in the Spanish streams never became low enough to constrain diversity, but did in the New Zealand streams. Combining results from the two regions, there is no evidence of a decline in diversity with higher productivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-121
Number of pages13
JournalAquatic Ecology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013


  • Algae
  • Diversity
  • EPT
  • Lotic
  • Macroinvertebrate
  • New Zealand
  • Periphyton
  • Productivity
  • Richness
  • Spain


Dive into the research topics of 'Productivity-diversity relationships for stream invertebrates differ geographically'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this