TY - JOUR
T1 - Materials, fuels, upgrading, economy, and life cycle assessment of the pyrolysis of algal and lignocellulosic biomass
T2 - a review
AU - Osman, Ahmed I.
AU - Farghali, Mohamed
AU - Ihara, Ikko
AU - Elgarahy, Ahmed M.
AU - Ayyad, Amir
AU - Mehta, Neha
AU - Ng, Kim Hoong
AU - Abd El-Monaem, Eman M.
AU - Eltaweil, Abdelazeem S.
AU - Hosny, Mohamed
AU - Hamed, Seham M.
AU - Fawzy, Samer
AU - Yap, Pow Seng
AU - Rooney, David W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Ahmed I. Osman and Prof. David W. Rooney wish to acknowledge the support of The Bryden Centre project (Project ID VA5048), which was awarded by The European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme, managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB), with match funding provided by the Department for the Economy in Northern Ireland and the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation in the Republic of Ireland. The researcher (Mohamed Hosny) is funded by a full scholarship (MM32/21) from the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research represented by the Egyptian Bureau for Cultural & Educational Affairs in London. Kim Hoong Ng would like to acknowledge the supports provided by National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, and Ming Chi University of Technology under the projects of 111-221-E-131-010- and AI003-1300-112, respectively.
Funding Information:
Dr. Ahmed I. Osman and Prof. David W. Rooney wish to acknowledge the support of The Bryden Centre project (Project ID VA5048), which was awarded by The European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme, managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB), with match funding provided by the Department for the Economy in Northern Ireland and the Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation in the Republic of Ireland. The researcher (Mohamed Hosny) is funded by a full scholarship (MM32/21) from the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research represented by the Egyptian Bureau for Cultural & Educational Affairs in London. Kim Hoong Ng would like to acknowledge the supports provided by National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, and Ming Chi University of Technology under the projects of 111-221-E-131-010- and AI003-1300-112, respectively.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Climate change issues are calling for advanced methods to produce materials and fuels in a carbon–neutral and circular way. For instance, biomass pyrolysis has been intensely investigated during the last years. Here we review the pyrolysis of algal and lignocellulosic biomass with focus on pyrolysis products and mechanisms, oil upgrading, combining pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion, economy, and life cycle assessment. Products include oil, gas, and biochar. Upgrading techniques comprise hot vapor filtration, solvent addition, emulsification, esterification and transesterification, hydrotreatment, steam reforming, and the use of supercritical fluids. We examined the economic viability in terms of profitability, internal rate of return, return on investment, carbon removal service, product pricing, and net present value. We also reviewed 20 recent studies of life cycle assessment. We found that the pyrolysis method highly influenced product yield, ranging from 9.07 to 40.59% for oil, from 10.1 to 41.25% for biochar, and from 11.93 to 28.16% for syngas. Feedstock type, pyrolytic temperature, heating rate, and reaction retention time were the main factors controlling the distribution of pyrolysis products. Pyrolysis mechanisms include bond breaking, cracking, polymerization and re-polymerization, and fragmentation. Biochar from residual forestry could sequester 2.74 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per ton biochar when applied to the soil and has thus the potential to remove 0.2–2.75 gigatons of atmospheric carbon dioxide annually. The generation of biochar and bio-oil from the pyrolysis process is estimated to be economically feasible.
AB - Climate change issues are calling for advanced methods to produce materials and fuels in a carbon–neutral and circular way. For instance, biomass pyrolysis has been intensely investigated during the last years. Here we review the pyrolysis of algal and lignocellulosic biomass with focus on pyrolysis products and mechanisms, oil upgrading, combining pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion, economy, and life cycle assessment. Products include oil, gas, and biochar. Upgrading techniques comprise hot vapor filtration, solvent addition, emulsification, esterification and transesterification, hydrotreatment, steam reforming, and the use of supercritical fluids. We examined the economic viability in terms of profitability, internal rate of return, return on investment, carbon removal service, product pricing, and net present value. We also reviewed 20 recent studies of life cycle assessment. We found that the pyrolysis method highly influenced product yield, ranging from 9.07 to 40.59% for oil, from 10.1 to 41.25% for biochar, and from 11.93 to 28.16% for syngas. Feedstock type, pyrolytic temperature, heating rate, and reaction retention time were the main factors controlling the distribution of pyrolysis products. Pyrolysis mechanisms include bond breaking, cracking, polymerization and re-polymerization, and fragmentation. Biochar from residual forestry could sequester 2.74 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per ton biochar when applied to the soil and has thus the potential to remove 0.2–2.75 gigatons of atmospheric carbon dioxide annually. The generation of biochar and bio-oil from the pyrolysis process is estimated to be economically feasible.
KW - Biomass
KW - Economic and life cycle assessment
KW - Product distribution
KW - Pyrolysis
KW - Pyrolysis integration
KW - Pyrolysis upgrading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148615526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10311-023-01573-7
DO - 10.1007/s10311-023-01573-7
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85148615526
SN - 1610-3653
VL - 21
SP - 1419
EP - 1476
JO - Environmental Chemistry Letters
JF - Environmental Chemistry Letters
IS - 3
ER -