TY - JOUR
T1 - Football, Media, and Homophobia
T2 - Public Framing of the First Pride Game in the Australian Football League
AU - Sherwood, Merryn
AU - Donaldson, Alex
AU - Dyson, Suzanne
AU - Lowden, David
AU - Marjoribanks, Timothy
AU - Shill, Jane
AU - Bolam, Bruce
AU - Nicholson, Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Two Australian football clubs—St Kilda and the Sydney Swans—played the first Pride Game in Australian professional sport in 2016 to support and include the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) community at and through a major sporting event. This study examines the framing of this game in the print and online media and in public responses via comments on media coverage and comments on Facebook posts. The framing of both the media coverage and the public response was predominantly supportive, with the theme of the “inclusion,” of gay Australian Football League players and the broader LGBTIQ community, prominent. However, there was a significant difference in the frames used in media coverage compared to the public response to this coverage. There was a relatively high proportion of unsupportive comments (e.g., a “stick to football” theme), including pernicious homophobia, present, particularly in the public response, compared to other recent related research. Overall, the findings suggest that, while there was strong support for the Pride Game, homophobia in sport remains, and the media, particularly social media, can be a platform for its expression. This study also highlights the value in analysing multiple platforms in media framing research.
AB - Two Australian football clubs—St Kilda and the Sydney Swans—played the first Pride Game in Australian professional sport in 2016 to support and include the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) community at and through a major sporting event. This study examines the framing of this game in the print and online media and in public responses via comments on media coverage and comments on Facebook posts. The framing of both the media coverage and the public response was predominantly supportive, with the theme of the “inclusion,” of gay Australian Football League players and the broader LGBTIQ community, prominent. However, there was a significant difference in the frames used in media coverage compared to the public response to this coverage. There was a relatively high proportion of unsupportive comments (e.g., a “stick to football” theme), including pernicious homophobia, present, particularly in the public response, compared to other recent related research. Overall, the findings suggest that, while there was strong support for the Pride Game, homophobia in sport remains, and the media, particularly social media, can be a platform for its expression. This study also highlights the value in analysing multiple platforms in media framing research.
KW - Australian football
KW - homophobia
KW - media framing
KW - Pride Game
KW - public framing
KW - social media
KW - sport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078149862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2167479519901118
DO - 10.1177/2167479519901118
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078149862
SN - 2167-4795
VL - 8
SP - 545
EP - 565
JO - Communication and Sport
JF - Communication and Sport
IS - 4-5
ER -