Corrigendum to “Whole-cell bioreporters and risk assessment of environmental pollution: A proof-of-concept study using lead” [Environ. Pollut. 229 (2017) 902–910](S0269749117318584)(10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.068)

Xiaokai Zhang, Boqiang Qin, Jianming Deng, Mona Wells*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret that we incorrectly identified the wild type in the paper. In the methods, the first sentence of the passage in section 2.1 should read: In this research, Escherichia coli strain zntA, which has the capacity to emit a dose-dependent bioluminescence in response to available Pb (Riether et al., 2001), was used for Pb bioavailability evaluation. The subsequent mentions of the wild type Cupriavidus metallidurans should be Escherichia coli. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113744
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume257
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Whole-cell bioreporters and risk assessment of environmental pollution: A proof-of-concept study using lead” [Environ. Pollut. 229 (2017) 902–910](S0269749117318584)(10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.068)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this