TY - JOUR
T1 - The mobilization of ‘capabilities’ as an idea and practice in today’s China
AU - Cappelletti, Alessandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Global South Ltd.
PY - 2025/7/21
Y1 - 2025/7/21
N2 - This article examines how Amartya Sen's concept of ‘capabilities’1 is deployed as state discourse in China to justify the socio-political engineering of minority communities, particularly Uyghurs. Promoted as a developmental tool, the narrative casts these groups as ‘backward’ and needing intervention - yet rather than promoting equity, it reinforces structural inequalities and legitimizes Han Chinese exclusion of Uyghur identities. Drawing from interviews and fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2025, the research explores how Uyghurs navigate their daily and spiritual lives in urban China, facing policies they perceive as alien yet imposed by a state claiming to represent them. Introducing the concepts of ‘space of mind’ and ‘pensabilities’, the study highlights alternative epistemologies and pluralistic strategies that challenge homogenizing integration practices. These offer new visions for genuine development and belonging, revealing the nuanced tensions between identity, citizenship and state policy in a deeply multi-normative national context.
AB - This article examines how Amartya Sen's concept of ‘capabilities’1 is deployed as state discourse in China to justify the socio-political engineering of minority communities, particularly Uyghurs. Promoted as a developmental tool, the narrative casts these groups as ‘backward’ and needing intervention - yet rather than promoting equity, it reinforces structural inequalities and legitimizes Han Chinese exclusion of Uyghur identities. Drawing from interviews and fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2025, the research explores how Uyghurs navigate their daily and spiritual lives in urban China, facing policies they perceive as alien yet imposed by a state claiming to represent them. Introducing the concepts of ‘space of mind’ and ‘pensabilities’, the study highlights alternative epistemologies and pluralistic strategies that challenge homogenizing integration practices. These offer new visions for genuine development and belonging, revealing the nuanced tensions between identity, citizenship and state policy in a deeply multi-normative national context.
KW - capabilities
KW - China’s socio-economic development
KW - ethnic minorities
KW - ethnic policies
KW - Uyghurs
KW - pensabilities
KW - epistemologies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011702720
U2 - 10.1080/02634937.2025.2521781
DO - 10.1080/02634937.2025.2521781
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011702720
SN - 0263-4937
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Central Asian Survey
JF - Central Asian Survey
ER -