Stereoselective potencies and relative toxicities of γ-coniceine and N-methylconiine enantiomers

  • Stephen T. Lee*
  • , Benedict T. Green
  • , Kevin D. Welch
  • , Glenn T. Jordan
  • , Qian Zhang
  • , Kip E. Panter
  • , David Hughes
  • , Cheng Wei Tom Chang
  • , James A. Pfister
  • , Dale R. Gardner
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

γ-Coniceine, coniine, and N-methylconiine are toxic alkaloids present in poison hemlock (Conium maculatum). We previously reported the comparison of the relative potencies of (+)- and (-)-coniine enantiomers. In this study, we synthesized γ-coniceine and the enantiomers of N-methylconiine and determined the biological activity of γ-coniceine and each of the N-methylconiine enantiomers in vitro and in vivo. The relative potencies of these piperidine alkaloids on cells expressing human fetal muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors had the rank order of γ-coniceine > (-)-N-methylconiine > (±)-N-methylconiine > (+)-N-methylconiine. The relative lethalities of γ-coniceine and (-)-, (±)-, and (+)-N-methylconiine in vivo using a mouse bioassay were 4.4, 16.1, 17.8, and 19.2 mg/kg, respectively. The results from this study suggest γ-coniceine is a more potent agonist than the enantiomers of N-methylconiine and that there is a stereoselective difference in the in vitro potencies of the enantiomers of N-methylconiine that correlates with the relative toxicities of the enantiomers in vivo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-621
Number of pages6
JournalChemical Research in Toxicology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stereoselective potencies and relative toxicities of γ-coniceine and N-methylconiine enantiomers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this