Abstract
Purpose: This paper examines whether there are differences in the nature of the price discovery process across established versus emerging stock markets using a twenty-country sample. Design/methodology/approach: The authors analyse security returns for traces of predictability or non-randomness using variance ratio tests, Granger-Causality models and runs tests. Findings: The findings pinpoint at predictabilities which seem inconsistent with market efficiency, and they suggest that the inherent cause of predictability differs across groups. Research limitations/implications: The authors present empirical evidence which may be used to attain a deeper understanding of the links between predictability and market efficiency, in view of the conflicting evidence in prior literature. Practical implications: Whilst the pricing process in emerging markets may be hindered by delayed adjustments, in case of established markets it seems that there is a higher tendency for price reversals which could be due to prior over-reactions. Originality/value: This study presents evidence of substantial differences in predictability across developed and emerging markets which was gleaned through the rigorous application of different empirical tests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-166 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Capital Markets Studies |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Delayed price adjustments
- Emerging markets
- Granger-causality
- Liquidity
- Over-reactions
- Predictability
- Price discovery
- Runs tests
- Variance ratio tests
- Vector autoregression
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predictability in securities price formation: differences between developed and emerging markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver