Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Post-subsidy Era: Potential for Carbon Pricing in Industrial Fisheries among Global Major Fishing Countries

  • He Peng
  • , Jianli Hao
  • , Linxiang Lyu
  • , Shuyan Wan
  • , Chunjiang An*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Concordia University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Industrial fishing’s harmful subsidies fuel both a fish stock crisis and rising greenhouse gas emissions, even as calls for a global ban by the World Trade Organization persist amid slow progress. This study employs the framework of climate policy stringency assessment to examine fisheries subsidy reform through a carbon pricing lens. Using emissions, political, and economic data, this study proposes the Objective Fisheries Carbon Pricing Intention (OFCPI) index for the 19 largest fishing nations. Supported by a Monte Carlo simulation, the results reveal that except for Denmark and Iceland, potential carbon revenues seldom offset the scale of harmful subsidies, frequently resulting in substantial shortfall. The findings suggest that policy change is primarily constrained by inadequate driving forces and objective limitations rather than by overt resistance. To address these challenges, we propose a fishery carbon pricing framework based on downstream emissions trading and individual transferable quotas, which offers a promising strategy for gradually eliminating harmful subsidies while promoting sustainable fisheries, mitigating climate impacts, and reconciling economic realities with environmental imperatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16130-16143
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume59
Issue number31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • carbon pricing
  • climate policy assessment
  • fishery carbon emissions
  • fishery harmful subsidies
  • fishing stock sustainability
  • fossil fuel usage
  • industrial fishery

Cite this