Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes

  • Peter K. Dearden*
  • , Megan J. Wilson
  • , Lisha Sablan
  • , Peter W. Osborne
  • , Melanie Havler
  • , Euan McNaughton
  • , Kiyoshi Kimura
  • , Natalia V. Milshina
  • , Martin Hasselmann
  • , Tanja Gempe
  • , Morten Schioett
  • , Susan J. Brown
  • , Christine G. Elsik
  • , Peter W.H. Holland
  • , Tatsuhiko Kadowaki
  • , Martin Beye
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Otago
  • University of Oxford
  • National Agriculture and Food Research Organization
  • Texas A&M University
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Kansas State University
  • Nagoya University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current insect genome sequencing projects provide an opportunity to extend studies of the evolution of developmental genes and pathways in insects. In this paper we examine the conservation and divergence of genes and developmental processes between Drosophila and the honey bee; two holometabolous insects whose lineages separated ∼300 million years ago, by comparing the presence or absence of 308 Drosophila developmental genes in the honey bee. Through examination of the presence or absence of genes involved in conserved pathways (cell signaling, axis formation, segmentation and homeobox transcription factors), we find that the vast majority of genes are conserved. Some genes involved in these processes are, however, missing in the honey bee. We have also examined the orthology of Drosophila genes involved in processes that differ between the honey bee and Drosophila. Many of these genes are preserved in the honey bee despite the process in which they act in Drosophila being different or absent in the honey bee. Many of the missing genes in both situations appear to have arisen recently in the Drosophila lineage, have single known functions in Drosophila, and act early in developmental pathways, while those that are preserved have pleiotropic functions. An evolutionary interpretation of these data is that either genes with multiple functions in a common ancestor are more likely to be preserved in both insect lineages, or genes that are preserved throughout evolution are more likely to co-opt additional functions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1376-1384
Number of pages9
JournalGenome Research
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this