Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery

  • Tong Qiu
  • , Robert Andrus
  • , Marie Claire Aravena
  • , Davide Ascoli
  • , Yves Bergeron
  • , Roberta Berretti
  • , Daniel Berveiller
  • , Michal Bogdziewicz
  • , Thomas Boivin
  • , Raul Bonal
  • , Don C. Bragg
  • , Thomas Caignard
  • , Rafael Calama
  • , J. Julio Camarero
  • , Chia Hao Chang-Yang
  • , Natalie L. Cleavitt
  • , Benoit Courbaud
  • , Francois Courbet
  • , Thomas Curt
  • , Adrian J. Das
  • Evangelia Daskalakou, Hendrik Davi, Nicolas Delpierre, Sylvain Delzon, Michael Dietze, Sergio Donoso Calderon, Laurent Dormont, Josep Espelta, Timothy J. Fahey, William Farfan-Rios, Catherine A. Gehring, Gregory S. Gilbert, Georg Gratzer, Cathryn H. Greenberg, Qinfeng Guo, Andrew Hacket-Pain, Arndt Hampe, Qingmin Han, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Kazuhiko Hoshizaki, Ines Ibanez, Jill F. Johnstone, Valentin Journé, Daisuke Kabeya, Christopher L. Kilner, Thomas Kitzberger, Johannes M.H. Knops, Richard K. Kobe, Georges Kunstler, Jonathan G.A. Lageard, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Mateusz Ledwon, Francois Lefevre, Theodor Leininger, Jean Marc Limousin, James A. Lutz, Diana Macias, Eliot J.B. McIntire, Christopher M. Moore, Emily Moran, Renzo Motta, Jonathan A. Myers, Thomas A. Nagel, Kyotaro Noguchi, Jean Marc Ourcival, Robert Parmenter, Ian S. Pearse, Ignacio M. Perez-Ramos, Lukasz Piechnik, John Poulsen, Renata Poulton-Kamakura, Miranda D. Redmond, Chantal D. Reid, Kyle C. Rodman, Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez, Javier D. Sanguinetti, C. Lane Scher, William H. Schlesinger, Harald Schmidt Van Marle, Barbara Seget, Shubhi Sharma, Miles Silman, Michael A. Steele, Nathan L. Stephenson, Jacob N. Straub, I. Fang Sun, Samantha Sutton, Jennifer J. Swenson, Margaret Swift, Peter A. Thomas, Maria Uriarte, Giorgio Vacchiano, Thomas T. Veblen, Amy V. Whipple, Thomas G. Whitham, Andreas P. Wion, Boyd Wright, S. Joseph Wright, Kai Zhu, Jess K. Zimmerman, Roman Zlotin, Magdalena Zywiec, James S. Clark*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Duke University
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Universidad de Chile
  • University of Turin
  • Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • INRAE
  • Complutense University
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • Université de Bordeaux
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
  • CSIC - Pyrenean Institute of Ecology
  • National Sun Yat-sen University
  • Cornell University
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Aix-Marseille Université
  • United States Geological Survey
  • Institute of Mediterranean and Forest Ecosystems
  • Boston University
  • CNRS
  • CREAF - Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Northern Arizona University
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • Institute of Forest Ecology
  • University of Liverpool
  • Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Akita Prefectural University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks
  • Universidad Nacional del Comahue
  • Michigan State University
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • DePaul University
  • Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Université de Montpellier
  • Utah State University
  • University of New Mexico
  • Natural Resources Canada
  • Colby College
  • University of California Merced
  • University of Ljubljana
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • CSIC - Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Seville
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Seville
  • Bilogo Dpto. Conservacin y Manejo Parque Nacional Lanin Elordi y Perito Moreno
  • Wake Forest University
  • Wilkes University
  • The College at Brockport, State University of New York
  • National Dong Hwa University
  • Keele University
  • Columbia University
  • University of Milan
  • University of New England
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • University of Puerto Rico
  • Geography Department and Russian and East European Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationships that control seed production in trees are fundamental to understanding the evolution of forest species and their capacity to recover from increasing losses to drought, fire, and harvest. A synthesis of fecundity data from 714 species worldwide allowed us to examine hypotheses that are central to quantifying reproduction, a foundation for assessing fitness in forest trees. Four major findings emerged. First, seed production is not constrained by a strict trade-off between seed size and numbers. Instead, seed numbers vary over ten orders of magnitude, with species that invest in large seeds producing more seeds than expected from the 1:1 trade-off. Second, gymnosperms have lower seed production than angiosperms, potentially due to their extra investments in protective woody cones. Third, nutrient-demanding species, indicated by high foliar phosphorus concentrations, have low seed production. Finally, sensitivity of individual species to soil fertility varies widely, limiting the response of community seed production to fertility gradients. In combination, these findings can inform models of forest response that need to incorporate reproductive potential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2381
JournalNature Communications
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this