Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Income inequality and economic growth: A re-examination of theory and evidence

  • Mehmet Balcilar
  • , Rangan Gupta
  • , Wei Ma
  • , Philton Makena*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Eastern Mediterranean University
  • Montpellier Business School
  • University of Pretoria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We re-examine the theoretical and empirical relationship between income inequality and long-run economic growth in an endogenous growth model with a flat tax on income, distributive conflicts among agents, and median voter dynamics. We show that when government spends tax revenue on the provision of public goods in the form of both production and consumption services, the theoretical relationship between inequality and economic growth is neither strictly positive nor strictly negative, but ambiguous. An empirical evaluation of the theoretical findings is carried out by applying a semi-parametric model on a sample of 63 countries for the period 1991–2017. Results show that the relationship between income inequality and growth takes the form of an inverted U-shape in that income inequality initially has a positive impact on growth up to an average Gini coefficient threshold of 35.92, beyond which it negatively impacts on growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-757
Number of pages21
JournalReview of Development Economics
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • economic growth
  • endogenous growth
  • semi-parametric model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Income inequality and economic growth: A re-examination of theory and evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this