TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a machine learning multiclass screening tool for periodontal health status based on non-clinical parameters and salivary biomarkers.
AU - Deng, Ke
AU - Zonta, Francesco
AU - Yang, Huang
AU - Pelekos, George
AU - Tonetti, Maurizio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Aim: To develop a multiclass non-clinical screening tool for periodontal disease and assess its accuracy for differentiating periodontal health, gingivitis and different stages of periodontitis. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic study on a convenience sample of 408 consecutive subjects was conducted by applying three non-clinical index tests estimating different features of the periodontal health–disease spectrum: a self-administered questionnaire, an oral rinse activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care test (POCT) and determination of gingival bleeding on brushing (GBoB). Full-mouth periodontal examination was the reference standard. The periodontal diagnosis was made on the basis of the 2017 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions. Logistic regression and random forest (RF) analyses were performed to predict various periodontal diagnoses, and the accuracy measures were assessed. Results: Four-hundred and eight subjects were enrolled in this study, including those with periodontal health (16.2%), gingivitis (15.2%) and stage I (15.9%), stage II (15.9%), stage III (29.7%) and stage IV (7.1%) periodontitis. Nine predictors, namely ‘gum disease’ (Q1), ‘a rating of gum/teeth health’ (Q2), ‘tooth cleaning’ (Q3a), the symptom of ‘loose teeth’ (Q4), ‘use of floss’ (Q7), aMMP-8 POCT, self-reported GBoB, haemoglobin and age, resulted in high levels of accuracy in the RF classifier. High accuracy (area under the ROC curve > 0.94) was observed for the discrimination of three (health, gingivitis and periodontitis) and six classes (health, gingivitis, stages I, II, III and IV periodontitis). Confusion matrices showed that the misclassification of a periodontitis case as health or gingivitis was less than 1%–2%. Conclusions: Machine learning-based classifiers, such as RF analyses, are promising tools for multiclass assessment of periodontal health and disease in a non-clinical setting. Results need to be externally validated in appropriately sized independent samples (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03928080).
AB - Aim: To develop a multiclass non-clinical screening tool for periodontal disease and assess its accuracy for differentiating periodontal health, gingivitis and different stages of periodontitis. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic study on a convenience sample of 408 consecutive subjects was conducted by applying three non-clinical index tests estimating different features of the periodontal health–disease spectrum: a self-administered questionnaire, an oral rinse activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care test (POCT) and determination of gingival bleeding on brushing (GBoB). Full-mouth periodontal examination was the reference standard. The periodontal diagnosis was made on the basis of the 2017 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions. Logistic regression and random forest (RF) analyses were performed to predict various periodontal diagnoses, and the accuracy measures were assessed. Results: Four-hundred and eight subjects were enrolled in this study, including those with periodontal health (16.2%), gingivitis (15.2%) and stage I (15.9%), stage II (15.9%), stage III (29.7%) and stage IV (7.1%) periodontitis. Nine predictors, namely ‘gum disease’ (Q1), ‘a rating of gum/teeth health’ (Q2), ‘tooth cleaning’ (Q3a), the symptom of ‘loose teeth’ (Q4), ‘use of floss’ (Q7), aMMP-8 POCT, self-reported GBoB, haemoglobin and age, resulted in high levels of accuracy in the RF classifier. High accuracy (area under the ROC curve > 0.94) was observed for the discrimination of three (health, gingivitis and periodontitis) and six classes (health, gingivitis, stages I, II, III and IV periodontitis). Confusion matrices showed that the misclassification of a periodontitis case as health or gingivitis was less than 1%–2%. Conclusions: Machine learning-based classifiers, such as RF analyses, are promising tools for multiclass assessment of periodontal health and disease in a non-clinical setting. Results need to be externally validated in appropriately sized independent samples (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03928080).
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - multiclass prediction
KW - periodontitis
KW - random forest
KW - screening
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85170652288
U2 - 10.1111/jcpe.13856
DO - 10.1111/jcpe.13856
M3 - Article
C2 - 37697491
SN - 0303-6979
VL - 51
SP - 1547
EP - 1560
JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
IS - 12
ER -