Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Customer political sentiment and supplier relationship-specific investments

  • Pin Ju Chen
  • , Lili Jiu*
  • , Po Hsiang Yu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Feng Chia University
  • National Chengchi University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between customer political sentiment and supplier relationship-specific investments (RSIs). We expect a positive relationship, as favorable customer political sentiment signals optimistic future business conditions and stronger expected demand from customers, thereby encouraging suppliers to increase their specific investments. Using established measures of RSIs and political sentiment, we document a positive association between customer political sentiment and supplier RSIs. This result remains robust when we employ the entropy balancing method and apply customer CEO turnover as a plausibly exogenous shock. We further show that suppliers with lower bargaining power are more dependent on customer political sentiment for their investment decisions. Channel analysis indicates that the positive customer political sentiment predominantly affects supplier RSIs by fostering an optimistic outlook. Our cross-sectional analyses show that the positive association between customer political sentiment and supplier RSIs is more pronounced when suppliers face greater uncertainty and when customer information is less transparent. Overall, this study offers insights into the multifaceted dynamics of political sentiment, supply chain intricacies, and strategic investment decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100848
JournalAdvances in Accounting
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Information asymmetry
  • Political sentiment
  • Relationship-specific investments
  • Supply chain relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Customer political sentiment and supplier relationship-specific investments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this