Abstract
Law and development, as both movement and practice, has led a tumultuous life: a hurried zenith cut short by a fatal critique followed by an opportunistic resurrection. The name alone is sufficient to trigger a range of reactions, extending from the complimentary to the condemnatory. In this article I track law and development's evolution via an examination of its role in the remodelling of Egyptian society in the post-Nasser era. While the 2011 revolution has encouraged institutions such as USAID to hasten their legal reform efforts, I argue that these are more akin to counter-revolution by ideology than genuine revolution by law. Nevertheless, rather than relegate the movement to the annals of imperial intrigue, I conclude by proposing the use of legal pluralism to revive, and possibly ignite, law and development's emancipatory potential.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1611-1629 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Third World Quarterly |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Counter-revolution by ideology? Law and development's vision(s) for post-revolutionary Egypt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver