TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of CNN and MLP in Magnetic Positioning Applications
AU - Yang, Zhiqin
AU - Hou, Yijing
AU - Zou, Haoming
AU - Li, Jiazhen
AU - Xiao, Yiyang
AU - Zhang, Zeqing
AU - Huang, Yuanrui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Magnetic positioning, a noncontact method with broad application potential in industry, medical robotics, and autonomous navigation, is limited by environmental interference, sensor noise, and high computational complexity. This study compares Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) for high-precision 3D magnetic field-based positioning. Datasets (simulating a 4×4 magnetic sensor array with Gaussian noise) were used to train and test both models: MLP processed 48-dimensional vectors, while CNN utilized 4×4×3 tensors to preserve spatial relationships. Evaluation metrics included Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for position and average angle error for direction. Experimental results show CNN outperforms MLP: lower position RMSE (0.0062 m vs. 0.0063 m) and smaller angle error (5.6307° vs. 5.9658°), with stronger robustness to noise. These findings confirm CNN's suitability for magnetic positioning (due to superior local spatial feature extraction) and provide insights for optimizing neural network architectures in such systems.
AB - Magnetic positioning, a noncontact method with broad application potential in industry, medical robotics, and autonomous navigation, is limited by environmental interference, sensor noise, and high computational complexity. This study compares Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) for high-precision 3D magnetic field-based positioning. Datasets (simulating a 4×4 magnetic sensor array with Gaussian noise) were used to train and test both models: MLP processed 48-dimensional vectors, while CNN utilized 4×4×3 tensors to preserve spatial relationships. Evaluation metrics included Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for position and average angle error for direction. Experimental results show CNN outperforms MLP: lower position RMSE (0.0062 m vs. 0.0063 m) and smaller angle error (5.6307° vs. 5.9658°), with stronger robustness to noise. These findings confirm CNN's suitability for magnetic positioning (due to superior local spatial feature extraction) and provide insights for optimizing neural network architectures in such systems.
KW - CNN
KW - deep learning
KW - Magnetic localization
KW - MLP
KW - position estimation
KW - sensor array
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035191607
U2 - 10.1109/CIoTSC67482.2025.11413030
DO - 10.1109/CIoTSC67482.2025.11413030
M3 - Conference Proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:105035191607
T3 - Proceedings - 2025 International Conference on Computer, Internet of Things and Smart City, CIoTSC 2025
BT - Proceedings - 2025 International Conference on Computer, Internet of Things and Smart City, CIoTSC 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 International Conference on Computer, Internet of Things and Smart City, CIoTSC 2025
Y2 - 7 November 2025 through 9 November 2025
ER -