Abstract
Redressing biases in extant literature linking Chinese official finance and state repression, this article employs standard multiple regression analysis to comparatively assess the effects of different attributes of Chinese and traditional official finance on variations in rates of repression across Africa over the period of 2001-2018. Statistical outputs reveal more similarities than differences in the effects of Chinese and traditional official finance on repression. To prevent diversionary use of foreign official finance on repression, reforms towards specification of purposes of inflows in recipient African states are recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 233-254 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Peacebuilding |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Aid
- China
- Foreign official finance
- Grants
- Loans
- Repression
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the effects of Chinese and traditional official finance on state repression in Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver