Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Battery Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle for Last-Mile Transportation

  • Jieyi Zhang
  • , Zhong Shuo Chen
  • , Xinrui Zhang
  • , Heran Zhang
  • , Ruobin Gao*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates whether Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) or Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) represent the superior alternative to conventional vehicles for last-mile delivery, with a particular focus on large enterprises that prioritize both economic feasibility and environmental performance. Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost methodologies are applied to evaluate both technologies across the full cradle-to-grave life cycle within a unified framework. The functional unit is defined as one kilometer traveled by a BEV or FCEV in last-mile transportation, and the system boundary includes vehicle manufacturing, operation, maintenance, and end-of-life treatment. The environmental impacts are assessed using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method implemented in OpenLCA 2.0.4, and normalization follows the standards provided by the official ReCiPe 2016 framework. The East China Power Grid serves as the baseline electricity mix for the operational stage. Regarding GHG emissions, FCEVs demonstrate a 12.36% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared to BEVs. This reduction is particularly significant during the operational phase, where FCEVs can lower CO2 emissions by 53.51% per vehicle relative to BEVs, largely due to hydrogen energy’s higher efficiency and durability. In terms of economic costs, BEVs hold a slight advantage over FCEVs, costing approximately 0.8 RMB/km/car less. However, during the manufacturing phase, FCEVs present greater environmental challenges. It is recommended that companies fully consider which environmental issues they wish to make a greater contribution to when selecting vehicle types. This study provides insight and implications for large companies with financial viability concerns about environmental impact regarding selecting the two types of vehicles for last-mile transportation. The conclusions offer guidance for companies assessing which vehicle technology better aligns with their long-term operational and sustainability priorities. It can also help relevant practitioners and researchers to develop solutions to last-mile transportation from the perspective of different enterprise sizes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number136
JournalEnergies
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • battery electric vehicle
  • fuel cell electric vehicle
  • last-mile delivery
  • life cycle assessment
  • life cycle cost

Cite this